In the picture is a UK electricity worker in the 1970s. Pictures like this appeared in many newspapers at the time. In 1972, electricity workers in the UK asked to be paid more, and they decided to stop working until their wish was answered. The government worried that there wouldn't be enough electricity for the country if these workers didn't go to work, so it agreed to give them the pay rise. However, the story didn't end there.
A year later, the electricity workers asked for another pay rise. To get what they wanted, they worked shorter hours and acted like they would walk away from their job anytime. But this time, the government decided to fight. To save electricity, it made new rules for people to follow. For example, each family could turn on the heat in only one room; TV stations had to stop their shows at 10:30 p.m.; businesses could open only three days a week.
People's lives were greatly changed. Without enough heat to keep the house warm, people covered themselves in blankets all the time. Hospitals had to use candles because they couldn't keep all the lights on. Factories couldn't keep their machines working. Many people lost their jobs. For months, people were paying the price while the electricity workers were fighting for their wish. In the end, the government agreed to the second pay rise. This picture shows what many people thought of the electricity workers during the "dark" time.
electricity 電力
government 政府
likely 可能
In the UK in the 1970s, what did people most likely think of the UK electricity workers?
A
They were not brave enough to fix their problems
B
They worked like robots and never learned to change
C
They were asking too much and did not know when to stop
D
They did not care whether their job might hurt people's health
正解:(C) They were asking too much and did not know when to stop
文章最後說,這張圖片呈現了 many people thought of the electricity workers,圖片上的文字包含 OPEN ALL THE TIME、NOTHING HERE、ALWAYS OUT,分別對應嘴巴永遠開著(不停開口要)、心裡空空(沒把別人放心上)、手總是伸著(一直索取)。綜合兩次加薪與社會代價,民眾最可能認為他們貪求過多、不知適可而止。
這是推論題,原文沒有直接寫 people thought they were asking too much,但情節與諷刺圖提供了充分線索。
誘答分析
•
(A) They were not brave enough to fix their problems.:工人敢停工、敢與政府對抗,不能說不勇敢。民眾的不滿也不是因為他們缺乏勇氣。
•
(B) They worked like robots and never learned to change.:文章反而說他們縮短工時、隨時可能離職,沒有像機器人般固定工作。never learned to change 也沒有根據。
•
(D) They did not care whether their job might hurt people's health.:限電確實影響醫院和家庭保暖,但工人的 job 本身不是傷害健康;問題在罷工與加薪行動造成社會代價。這個選項把部分後果說得太狹窄。
(C) 能同時解釋「第二次要求加薪」與「民眾諷刺態度」,涵蓋範圍最完整。
關鍵字彙
most likely(最可能)、ask too much(要求過多)、know when to stop(知道何時停止)、pay the price(付出代價)、strike(n. 罷工,文章未直接使用)、attitude(n. 態度)